# Doneerveilig vs Teaming

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about 7.66 more of every 100 donated than Doneerveilig (£100.00 vs €92.34 per 100). Doneerveilig shows the higher Trustpilot score (2.9/5), but it rests on just 44 reviews — too few to outweigh Teaming’s 2.8/5 from 10 reviews.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Doneerveilig | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €92.34 | £100.00 |
| Platform fee | 6.7% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 2.9 (44) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 21 | 80 |
| Country coverage | 0 | 0 |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | 1 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 2 | 0 |

## Choose Doneerveilig if

> Dutch and Belgian individuals running personal fundraising campaigns who prioritise a security-focused, PSD2-compliant platform with escrow handling and a simple, quick setup.

- Security-focused framing: PSD2 compliance supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank, escrow handling, and SSL.
- Donations held on a third-party escrow account (derdengeldenrekening) before payout.
- Quick, simple campaign setup aimed at individual causes.
- Account verification via a one-cent micro-transfer.


## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.