# Doneerveilig vs GINGER

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, GINGER delivers about €5.51 more of every €100 donated than Doneerveilig (€97.85 vs €92.34). GINGER stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Doneerveilig does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Doneerveilig | GINGER |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €92.34 | €97.85 |
| Platform fee | 6.7% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.00 | 1.8% + €0.35 |
| Trustpilot | 2.9 (44) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 21 | 65 |
| Country coverage | 0 | 1 |
| Data residency | — | EU |
| Languages | 1 | 1 |
| Payment methods supported | 2 | 4 |

## Choose Doneerveilig if

> Dutch and Belgian individuals running personal fundraising campaigns who prioritise a security-focused, PSD2-compliant platform with escrow handling and a simple, quick setup.

- Security-focused framing: PSD2 compliance supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank, escrow handling, and SSL.
- Donations held on a third-party escrow account (derdengeldenrekening) before payout.
- Quick, simple campaign setup aimed at individual causes.
- Account verification via a one-cent micro-transfer.


## Choose GINGER if

> Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

- One of the highest project-success rates among Italian crowdfunding platforms
- Mixed model supporting both reward-based campaigns and donation fundraising
- Open to individuals, associations, businesses, and public administrations
- Does not retain a platform percentage of funds raised (payment-processing commissions apply)