# Doneeractie vs Teaming

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about 6.49 more of every 100 donated than Doneeractie (£100.00 vs €93.51 per 100). On the headline numbers, Doneeractie and Teaming are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Doneeractie | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €93.51 | £100.00 |
| Platform fee | 6% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 2.7 (28) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 73 | 80 |
| Country coverage | 0 | 0 |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | 1 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 9 | 0 |

## Choose Doneeractie if

> Dutch and Belgian individuals and informal causes that want to launch a simple donation campaign quickly, with support for iDEAL, Bancontact, and other local payment methods.

- Independent Dutch platform online since 2016, active in the Netherlands and Belgium.
- Fast campaign setup, with organisers able to be online within minutes.
- Supports Dutch and Belgian payment methods including iDEAL, Wero, Bancontact, Belfius, and KBC/CBC, plus cards, PayPal, and Przelewy24.
- Campaign-owner verification handled via Payaut, with Mollie as the donor-facing payment gateway.


## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.