# Doare vs Supp.to

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Supp.to delivers about £5.76 more of every £100 donated than Doare (£99.51 vs £93.75). On the headline numbers, Doare and Supp.to are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Doare | Supp.to |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £93.75 | £99.51 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 5.8% + £0.45 | 0% + £0.49 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 72 | 56 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 2 |
| Data residency | — | NL |
| Languages | 3 | 2 |
| Payment methods supported | 8 | 17 |

## Choose Doare if

> Brazilian nonprofits and third-sector organizations that want hosted donation pages, recurring-giving tools, and a donor CRM to build a sustained local donor base, rather than a one-off campaign.

- Purpose-built nonprofit toolkit: donation pages, recurring giving, and donor CRM.
- Supports Brazilian rails including boleto and PIX, plus automatic recurring PIX.
- Tiered plans with per-transaction costs that decrease at higher tiers.
- Peer-to-peer ambassador fundraising and corporate ESG and matching products.


## Choose Supp.to if

> Dutch and Belgian individuals, groups and nonprofits that want a low, predictable per-donation fee with no percentage cut and no mandatory donor tips, plus an optional white-label or schools-focused (Sponsor.school) option.

- Flat per-donation fee on iDEAL and Wero (EUR 0.49) rather than a percentage cut, inclusive of 21% VAT.
- No hidden costs and no mandatory donor tip - you pay only for successful donations.
- Payments via Mollie Payments B.V., licensed under the Wft and supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank.
- Keep-it-all funding model - funds are paid out even if the target is not reached.

