# Doare vs iRaiser

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iRaiser delivers about £4.10 more of every £100 donated than Doare (£97.85 vs £93.75). iRaiser stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Doare does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Doare | iRaiser |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £93.75 | £97.85 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 5.8% + £0.45 | 1.9% + £0.25 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 72 | 75 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 19 |
| Data residency | — | EEA |
| Languages | 3 | 5 |
| Payment methods supported | 8 | 23 |

## Choose Doare if

> Brazilian nonprofits and third-sector organizations that want hosted donation pages, recurring-giving tools, and a donor CRM to build a sustained local donor base, rather than a one-off campaign.

- Purpose-built nonprofit toolkit: donation pages, recurring giving, and donor CRM.
- Supports Brazilian rails including boleto and PIX, plus automatic recurring PIX.
- Tiered plans with per-transaction costs that decrease at higher tiers.
- Peer-to-peer ambassador fundraising and corporate ESG and matching products.


## Choose iRaiser if

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.