# Doare vs iHelp

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iHelp delivers about 6.25 more of every 100 donated than Doare (€100.00 vs £93.75 per 100). iHelp stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Doare does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Doare | iHelp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £93.75 | €100.00 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 5.8% + £0.45 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 72 | 50 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 1 |
| Data residency | — | EU |
| Languages | 3 | 2 |
| Payment methods supported | 8 | 1 |

## Choose Doare if

> Brazilian nonprofits and third-sector organizations that want hosted donation pages, recurring-giving tools, and a donor CRM to build a sustained local donor base, rather than a one-off campaign.

- Purpose-built nonprofit toolkit: donation pages, recurring giving, and donor CRM.
- Supports Brazilian rails including boleto and PIX, plus automatic recurring PIX.
- Tiered plans with per-transaction costs that decrease at higher tiers.
- Peer-to-peer ambassador fundraising and corporate ESG and matching products.


## Choose iHelp if

> Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

- No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
- NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
- Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
- Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.