# Dift vs Yapla

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Dift delivers about 2.25 more of every 100 donated than Yapla (€98.05 vs £95.80 per 100). Dift stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Yapla does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Dift | Yapla |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €98.05 | £95.80 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 1.7% + €0.25 | 3.9% + £0.30 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.3 (6) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 51 | 81 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 5 |
| Data residency | EU | Canada or EU (by org region) |
| Languages | 2 | 3 |
| Payment methods supported | 0 | 4 |

## Choose Dift if

> French associations running time-boxed fundraising challenges with volunteer collectors, companies pursuing social and environmental philanthropy, and individuals giving to vetted associations with tax receipts.

- Structured, time-boxed fundraising challenges for associations with volunteer collectors
- Supports individual solidarity pots, association challenges, and corporate giving operations
- Automatic tax-receipt handling for individual and corporate donors
- Vets the partner associations it lists, with a focus on social and ecological impact


## Choose Yapla if

> Nonprofits, clubs, and associations in Canada and parts of Europe that want to run donations and fundraising inside a single tool alongside memberships, events, accounting, and contact management.

- All-in-one suite combining donations and crowdfunding with memberships, events, accounting, newsletters, and a CRM.
- Available in both French and English, with users in Canada and parts of Europe.
- Accepts a wide range of payment methods: credit card, Apple Pay, Google Pay, cheque, cash, and bank transfer.
- Offers an optional donor-contribution model that can cover the cost of payment processing.