# Dift vs Teaming

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about 1.95 more of every 100 donated than Dift (£100.00 vs €98.05 per 100). Dift stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Teaming does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Dift | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €98.05 | £100.00 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 1.7% + €0.25 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 51 | 80 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 0 |
| Data residency | EU | — |
| Languages | 2 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 0 | 0 |

## Choose Dift if

> French associations running time-boxed fundraising challenges with volunteer collectors, companies pursuing social and environmental philanthropy, and individuals giving to vetted associations with tax receipts.

- Structured, time-boxed fundraising challenges for associations with volunteer collectors
- Supports individual solidarity pots, association challenges, and corporate giving operations
- Automatic tax-receipt handling for individual and corporate donors
- Vets the partner associations it lists, with a focus on social and ecological impact


## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.