# Dift vs Supp.to

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Supp.to delivers about 1.46 more of every 100 donated than Dift (£99.51 vs €98.05 per 100). Dift stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Supp.to does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Dift | Supp.to |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €98.05 | £99.51 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 1.7% + €0.25 | 0% + £0.49 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 51 | 56 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 2 |
| Data residency | EU | NL |
| Languages | 2 | 2 |
| Payment methods supported | 0 | 17 |

## Choose Dift if

> French associations running time-boxed fundraising challenges with volunteer collectors, companies pursuing social and environmental philanthropy, and individuals giving to vetted associations with tax receipts.

- Structured, time-boxed fundraising challenges for associations with volunteer collectors
- Supports individual solidarity pots, association challenges, and corporate giving operations
- Automatic tax-receipt handling for individual and corporate donors
- Vets the partner associations it lists, with a focus on social and ecological impact


## Choose Supp.to if

> Dutch and Belgian individuals, groups and nonprofits that want a low, predictable per-donation fee with no percentage cut and no mandatory donor tips, plus an optional white-label or schools-focused (Sponsor.school) option.

- Flat per-donation fee on iDEAL and Wero (EUR 0.49) rather than a percentage cut, inclusive of 21% VAT.
- No hidden costs and no mandatory donor tip - you pay only for successful donations.
- Payments via Mollie Payments B.V., licensed under the Wft and supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank.
- Keep-it-all funding model - funds are paid out even if the target is not reached.