# Dift vs Little Phil

## What the data says.

Dift stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Little Phil does not. On the headline numbers, Dift and Little Phil are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Dift | Little Phil |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €98.05 | A$97.95 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 1.7% + €0.25 | 1.75% + A$0.30 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 51 | 51 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 1 |
| Data residency | EU | Outside AU (SG/HK/US) |
| Languages | 2 | 1 |
| Payment methods supported | 0 | 4 |

## Choose Dift if

> French associations running time-boxed fundraising challenges with volunteer collectors, companies pursuing social and environmental philanthropy, and individuals giving to vetted associations with tax receipts.

- Structured, time-boxed fundraising challenges for associations with volunteer collectors
- Supports individual solidarity pots, association challenges, and corporate giving operations
- Automatic tax-receipt handling for individual and corporate donors
- Vets the partner associations it lists, with a focus on social and ecological impact


## Choose Little Phil if

> Australian donors, companies, and nonprofits focused on impact transparency and modern giving options such as crypto, workplace giving, and Shopify post-checkout donations, where offshore data storage is not a blocker.

- Built-in impact-tracking so donors can see the effect of their giving first-hand.
- Nonprofits pay no commission on donations, per Little Phil's nonprofits page.
- Modern giving options: Apple Pay, Google Pay, cards, direct debit, internal credit, and cryptocurrency.
- Spans donor, nonprofit, and corporate giving, including workplace-giving programmes.