# Crowdfunding voor Clubs vs Teaming

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about 7.80 more of every 100 donated than Crowdfunding voor Clubs (£100.00 vs €92.20 per 100). On the headline numbers, Crowdfunding voor Clubs and Teaming are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Crowdfunding voor Clubs | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €92.20 | £100.00 |
| Platform fee | 7.5% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.30 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 33 | 80 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 0 |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | 1 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 1 | 0 |

## Choose Crowdfunding voor Clubs if

> Dutch sports clubs and cultural organisations that want to combine donation crowdfunding with bond-based club financing, and that prefer iDEAL payments with predictable per-donation or subscription pricing.

- Purpose-built for Dutch sports clubs and cultural organisations
- Combines donation crowdfunding with club-bond (obligatie) financing on one platform
- Two pricing tracks: a 7.5% per-donation fee (VAT-inclusive) or a fixed annual subscription
- iDEAL payments processed through Mollie, the standard Dutch online payment rail


## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.

