# Crowdfunding voor Clubs vs iRaiser

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iRaiser delivers about 5.65 more of every 100 donated than Crowdfunding voor Clubs (£97.85 vs €92.20 per 100). iRaiser stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Crowdfunding voor Clubs does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Crowdfunding voor Clubs | iRaiser |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €92.20 | £97.85 |
| Platform fee | 7.5% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.30 | 1.9% + £0.25 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 33 | 75 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 19 |
| Data residency | — | EEA |
| Languages | 1 | 5 |
| Payment methods supported | 1 | 23 |

## Choose Crowdfunding voor Clubs if

> Dutch sports clubs and cultural organisations that want to combine donation crowdfunding with bond-based club financing, and that prefer iDEAL payments with predictable per-donation or subscription pricing.

- Purpose-built for Dutch sports clubs and cultural organisations
- Combines donation crowdfunding with club-bond (obligatie) financing on one platform
- Two pricing tracks: a 7.5% per-donation fee (VAT-inclusive) or a fixed annual subscription
- iDEAL payments processed through Mollie, the standard Dutch online payment rail


## Choose iRaiser if

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.