# Crowdfunding voor Clubs vs iHelp

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iHelp delivers about €7.80 more of every €100 donated than Crowdfunding voor Clubs (€100.00 vs €92.20). iHelp stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Crowdfunding voor Clubs does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Crowdfunding voor Clubs | iHelp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €92.20 | €100.00 |
| Platform fee | 7.5% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.30 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 33 | 50 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 1 |
| Data residency | — | EU |
| Languages | 1 | 2 |
| Payment methods supported | 1 | 1 |

## Choose Crowdfunding voor Clubs if

> Dutch sports clubs and cultural organisations that want to combine donation crowdfunding with bond-based club financing, and that prefer iDEAL payments with predictable per-donation or subscription pricing.

- Purpose-built for Dutch sports clubs and cultural organisations
- Combines donation crowdfunding with club-bond (obligatie) financing on one platform
- Two pricing tracks: a 7.5% per-donation fee (VAT-inclusive) or a fixed annual subscription
- iDEAL payments processed through Mollie, the standard Dutch online payment rail


## Choose iHelp if

> Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

- No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
- NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
- Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
- Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.