# Coral vs iRaiser

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iRaiser delivers about 1.00 more of every 100 donated than Coral (£97.85 vs €96.85 per 100). iRaiser stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Coral does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Coral | iRaiser |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €96.85 | £97.85 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.9% + €0.25 | 1.9% + £0.25 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 40 | 75 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 19 |
| Data residency | — | EEA |
| Languages | 1 | 5 |
| Payment methods supported | 0 | 23 |

## Choose Coral if

> Spanish associations, foundations, and grassroots social or animal-welfare causes that want a zero-commission platform where donors can cover processing fees so the cause receives the full donation.

- 0% platform commission, sustained by voluntary donor tips (propinas)
- Stripe payment processing at 2.9% plus EUR 0.25 per donation, with donors able to cover the fee at checkout
- Automatic donation certificates for nonprofits accredited under Spain's Law 49/2002
- Specialised in solidarity causes: NGOs, foundations, animal rescue, and social projects


## Choose iRaiser if

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.