# Continue to Give vs Petje Af

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Continue to Give delivers about £3.05 more of every £100 donated than Petje Af (£97.05 vs £94.00). On the headline numbers, Continue to Give and Petje Af are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Continue to Give | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £97.05 | £94.00 |
| Platform fee | 2.7% | 6% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + £0.00 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 70 | 63 |
| Country coverage | 2 | 0 |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | 0 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 0 | 0 |

## Choose Continue to Give if

> US and Canadian churches, faith-based nonprofits, and missionaries that want an all-in-one giving platform with recurring and text giving, event tools, and built-in fund accounting.

- All-in-one toolkit: online giving, recurring and text giving, event registration, newsletters, and built-in fund accounting.
- Explicit faith-based positioning with a pledge not to deplatform organizations over their faith.
- Tiered plans including a no-monthly-cost Silver tier and a Gold tier with interchange-plus card rates.
- Optional donor-covers-fees toggle so organizations can receive the full donation amount.


## Choose Petje Af if

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.