# Continue to Give vs iHelp

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iHelp delivers about 2.95 more of every 100 donated than Continue to Give (€100.00 vs £97.05 per 100). iHelp stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Continue to Give does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Continue to Give | iHelp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £97.05 | €100.00 |
| Platform fee | 2.7% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + £0.00 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 70 | 50 |
| Country coverage | 2 | 1 |
| Data residency | — | EU |
| Languages | 0 | 2 |
| Payment methods supported | 0 | 1 |

## Choose Continue to Give if

> US and Canadian churches, faith-based nonprofits, and missionaries that want an all-in-one giving platform with recurring and text giving, event tools, and built-in fund accounting.

- All-in-one toolkit: online giving, recurring and text giving, event registration, newsletters, and built-in fund accounting.
- Explicit faith-based positioning with a pledge not to deplatform organizations over their faith.
- Tiered plans including a no-monthly-cost Silver tier and a Gold tier with interchange-plus card rates.
- Optional donor-covers-fees toggle so organizations can receive the full donation amount.


## Choose iHelp if

> Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

- No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
- NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
- Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
- Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.