# Continue to Give vs Gandee

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Continue to Give delivers about 3.05 more of every 100 donated than Gandee (£97.05 vs €94.00 per 100). Gandee stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Continue to Give does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Continue to Give | Gandee |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £97.05 | €94.00 |
| Platform fee | 2.7% | 6% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + £0.00 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 70 | 56 |
| Country coverage | 2 | 1 |
| Data residency | — | EU |
| Languages | 0 | 1 |
| Payment methods supported | 0 | 1 |

## Choose Continue to Give if

> US and Canadian churches, faith-based nonprofits, and missionaries that want an all-in-one giving platform with recurring and text giving, event tools, and built-in fund accounting.

- All-in-one toolkit: online giving, recurring and text giving, event registration, newsletters, and built-in fund accounting.
- Explicit faith-based positioning with a pledge not to deplatform organizations over their faith.
- Tiered plans including a no-monthly-cost Silver tier and a Gold tier with interchange-plus card rates.
- Optional donor-covers-fees toggle so organizations can receive the full donation amount.


## Choose Gandee if

> French individuals and companies who want to raise money for vetted associations through solidarity pots, corporate social-responsibility campaigns, or event-based giving, with automatic tax receipts.

- Donors give without charge; organisers create solidarity pots without a platform commission
- Partner associations are vetted before they can receive funds
- Automatic tax-deduction receipts for individual and corporate donors
- Corporate social-responsibility (RSE) campaigns and sponsor matching for companies