# Chuffed vs Teaming

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about £7.80 more of every £100 donated than Chuffed (£100.00 vs £92.20). Chuffed holds the stronger Trustpilot record: 4.8/5 across 668 reviews, against 2.8/5 across 10 for Teaming.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Chuffed | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £92.20 | £100.00 |
| Platform fee | 4.9% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.9% + £0.00 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 4.8 (668) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 79 | 80 |
| Country coverage | 29 | 0 |
| Data residency | AU | — |
| Languages | 4 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 5 | 0 |

## Choose Chuffed if

> Nonprofits, social enterprises, and community-cause organisers in 29 supported countries who want a 100%-free, tip-funded platform and are willing to complete identity verification before launching.

- Free to launch — no signup or monthly fees.
- Optional donor-tip model can make campaigns effectively free to run.
- Three flexible fee structures (keep-100%, shared, and flat-fee) to suit different campaigns.
- Mission-aligned: operates as a Social Benefit Company weighing social and community impact.


## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.