# Chuffed vs Supp.to

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Supp.to delivers about £7.31 more of every £100 donated than Chuffed (£99.51 vs £92.20). On the headline numbers, Chuffed and Supp.to are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Chuffed | Supp.to |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £92.20 | £99.51 |
| Platform fee | 4.9% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.9% + £0.00 | 0% + £0.49 |
| Trustpilot | 4.8 (668) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 79 | 56 |
| Country coverage | 29 | 2 |
| Data residency | AU | NL |
| Languages | 4 | 2 |
| Payment methods supported | 5 | 17 |

## Choose Chuffed if

> Nonprofits, social enterprises, and community-cause organisers in 29 supported countries who want a 100%-free, tip-funded platform and are willing to complete identity verification before launching.

- Free to launch — no signup or monthly fees.
- Optional donor-tip model can make campaigns effectively free to run.
- Three flexible fee structures (keep-100%, shared, and flat-fee) to suit different campaigns.
- Mission-aligned: operates as a Social Benefit Company weighing social and community impact.


## Choose Supp.to if

> Dutch and Belgian individuals, groups and nonprofits that want a low, predictable per-donation fee with no percentage cut and no mandatory donor tips, plus an optional white-label or schools-focused (Sponsor.school) option.

- Flat per-donation fee on iDEAL and Wero (EUR 0.49) rather than a percentage cut, inclusive of 21% VAT.
- No hidden costs and no mandatory donor tip - you pay only for successful donations.
- Payments via Mollie Payments B.V., licensed under the Wft and supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank.
- Keep-it-all funding model - funds are paid out even if the target is not reached.

