# Chuffed vs iRaiser

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iRaiser delivers about £5.65 more of every £100 donated than Chuffed (£97.85 vs £92.20). iRaiser stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Chuffed does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Chuffed | iRaiser |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £92.20 | £97.85 |
| Platform fee | 4.9% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.9% + £0.00 | 1.9% + £0.25 |
| Trustpilot | 4.8 (668) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 79 | 75 |
| Country coverage | 29 | 19 |
| Data residency | AU | EEA |
| Languages | 4 | 5 |
| Payment methods supported | 5 | 23 |

## Choose Chuffed if

> Nonprofits, social enterprises, and community-cause organisers in 29 supported countries who want a 100%-free, tip-funded platform and are willing to complete identity verification before launching.

- Free to launch — no signup or monthly fees.
- Optional donor-tip model can make campaigns effectively free to run.
- Three flexible fee structures (keep-100%, shared, and flat-fee) to suit different campaigns.
- Mission-aligned: operates as a Social Benefit Company weighing social and community impact.


## Choose iRaiser if

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.