# Chuffed vs iHelp

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iHelp delivers about 7.80 more of every 100 donated than Chuffed (€100.00 vs £92.20 per 100). iHelp stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Chuffed does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Chuffed | iHelp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £92.20 | €100.00 |
| Platform fee | 4.9% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.9% + £0.00 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 4.8 (668) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 79 | 50 |
| Country coverage | 29 | 1 |
| Data residency | AU | EU |
| Languages | 4 | 2 |
| Payment methods supported | 5 | 1 |

## Choose Chuffed if

> Nonprofits, social enterprises, and community-cause organisers in 29 supported countries who want a 100%-free, tip-funded platform and are willing to complete identity verification before launching.

- Free to launch — no signup or monthly fees.
- Optional donor-tip model can make campaigns effectively free to run.
- Three flexible fee structures (keep-100%, shared, and flat-fee) to suit different campaigns.
- Mission-aligned: operates as a Social Benefit Company weighing social and community impact.


## Choose iHelp if

> Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

- No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
- NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
- Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
- Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.