# Charitable Impact vs PIFworld

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Charitable Impact delivers about 3.60 more of every 100 donated than PIFworld (C$97.20 vs €93.60 per 100). On the headline numbers, Charitable Impact and PIFworld are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Charitable Impact | PIFworld |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | C$97.20 | €93.60 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 6.05% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.8% + C$0.00 | 0% + €0.35 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 71 | 56 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 1 |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | 1 | 2 |
| Payment methods supported | 5 | 0 |

## Choose Charitable Impact if

> Canadian individuals and families who want a single donor-advised Impact Account to organize their giving, support friends' causes, and receive a tax receipt for every contribution they add.

- Operates as a donor-advised fund: donors add money to an Impact Account and recommend gifts to charities over time.
- A tax receipt is issued for the full amount added to the Impact Account, regardless of when it is granted to charities.
- Accepts a wide range of assets, including cash, securities, real estate, and cryptocurrency.
- Peer-to-peer giving, Giving Groups, and campaigns let donors pool and direct money together.


## Choose PIFworld if

> Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

- Combines personal fundraising with structured corporate and employee-giving programmes.
- Connects individuals, nonprofits, and companies on a single platform.
- Participation-led model: supporters can donate, fundraise, or spread a project's message.
- Dutch and English interface for a Netherlands and European audience.