# Charitable Impact vs Doare

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Charitable Impact delivers about 3.45 more of every 100 donated than Doare (C$97.20 vs £93.75 per 100). On the headline numbers, Charitable Impact and Doare are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Charitable Impact | Doare |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | C$97.20 | £93.75 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.8% + C$0.00 | 5.8% + £0.45 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 71 | 72 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 1 |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | 1 | 3 |
| Payment methods supported | 5 | 8 |

## Choose Charitable Impact if

> Canadian individuals and families who want a single donor-advised Impact Account to organize their giving, support friends' causes, and receive a tax receipt for every contribution they add.

- Operates as a donor-advised fund: donors add money to an Impact Account and recommend gifts to charities over time.
- A tax receipt is issued for the full amount added to the Impact Account, regardless of when it is granted to charities.
- Accepts a wide range of assets, including cash, securities, real estate, and cryptocurrency.
- Peer-to-peer giving, Giving Groups, and campaigns let donors pool and direct money together.


## Choose Doare if

> Brazilian nonprofits and third-sector organizations that want hosted donation pages, recurring-giving tools, and a donor CRM to build a sustained local donor base, rather than a one-off campaign.

- Purpose-built nonprofit toolkit: donation pages, recurring giving, and donor CRM.
- Supports Brazilian rails including boleto and PIX, plus automatic recurring PIX.
- Tiered plans with per-transaction costs that decrease at higher tiers.
- Peer-to-peer ambassador fundraising and corporate ESG and matching products.