# BuonaCausa vs Yapla

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, BuonaCausa delivers about 4.20 more of every 100 donated than Yapla (€100.00 vs £95.80 per 100). BuonaCausa stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Yapla does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | BuonaCausa | Yapla |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €100.00 | £95.80 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.00 | 3.9% + £0.30 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.3 (6) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 60 | 81 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 5 |
| Data residency | EU | Canada or EU (by org region) |
| Languages | 1 | 3 |
| Payment methods supported | 4 | 4 |

## Choose BuonaCausa if

> Italian associations, nonprofits, and individuals who want a no-commission way to collect donations directly into their own accounts, and campaigners who pair fundraising with online petitions and activism.

- Donations are paid directly into the organiser's own bank, PayPal, or postal account without platform intermediation
- No platform commission charged on donations
- Reduced third-party processing costs for recognised nonprofit (ONLUS) organisations
- Combines donation fundraising with online petitions and activism on one platform


## Choose Yapla if

> Nonprofits, clubs, and associations in Canada and parts of Europe that want to run donations and fundraising inside a single tool alongside memberships, events, accounting, and contact management.

- All-in-one suite combining donations and crowdfunding with memberships, events, accounting, newsletters, and a CRM.
- Available in both French and English, with users in Canada and parts of Europe.
- Accepts a wide range of payment methods: credit card, Apple Pay, Google Pay, cheque, cash, and bank transfer.
- Offers an optional donor-contribution model that can cover the cost of payment processing.