# BuonaCausa vs PIFworld

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, BuonaCausa delivers about €6.40 more of every €100 donated than PIFworld (€100.00 vs €93.60). BuonaCausa stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while PIFworld does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | BuonaCausa | PIFworld |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €100.00 | €93.60 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 6.05% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + €0.35 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 60 | 56 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 1 |
| Data residency | EU | — |
| Languages | 1 | 2 |
| Payment methods supported | 4 | 0 |

## Choose BuonaCausa if

> Italian associations, nonprofits, and individuals who want a no-commission way to collect donations directly into their own accounts, and campaigners who pair fundraising with online petitions and activism.

- Donations are paid directly into the organiser's own bank, PayPal, or postal account without platform intermediation
- No platform commission charged on donations
- Reduced third-party processing costs for recognised nonprofit (ONLUS) organisations
- Combines donation fundraising with online petitions and activism on one platform


## Choose PIFworld if

> Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

- Combines personal fundraising with structured corporate and employee-giving programmes.
- Connects individuals, nonprofits, and companies on a single platform.
- Participation-led model: supporters can donate, fundraise, or spread a project's message.
- Dutch and English interface for a Netherlands and European audience.