# BuonaCausa vs iRaiser

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, BuonaCausa delivers about 2.15 more of every 100 donated than iRaiser (€100.00 vs £97.85 per 100). On the headline numbers, BuonaCausa and iRaiser are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | BuonaCausa | iRaiser |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €100.00 | £97.85 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.00 | 1.9% + £0.25 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 60 | 75 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 19 |
| Data residency | EU | EEA |
| Languages | 1 | 5 |
| Payment methods supported | 4 | 23 |

## Choose BuonaCausa if

> Italian associations, nonprofits, and individuals who want a no-commission way to collect donations directly into their own accounts, and campaigners who pair fundraising with online petitions and activism.

- Donations are paid directly into the organiser's own bank, PayPal, or postal account without platform intermediation
- No platform commission charged on donations
- Reduced third-party processing costs for recognised nonprofit (ONLUS) organisations
- Combines donation fundraising with online petitions and activism on one platform


## Choose iRaiser if

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.