# BuonaCausa vs Funraise

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, BuonaCausa delivers about 8.50 more of every 100 donated than Funraise (€100.00 vs £91.50 per 100). BuonaCausa stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Funraise does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | BuonaCausa | Funraise |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €100.00 | £91.50 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 5% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.00 | 2.9% + £0.60 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 60 | 79 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 0 |
| Data residency | EU | US |
| Languages | 1 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 4 | 5 |

## Choose BuonaCausa if

> Italian associations, nonprofits, and individuals who want a no-commission way to collect donations directly into their own accounts, and campaigners who pair fundraising with online petitions and activism.

- Donations are paid directly into the organiser's own bank, PayPal, or postal account without platform intermediation
- No platform commission charged on donations
- Reduced third-party processing costs for recognised nonprofit (ONLUS) organisations
- Combines donation fundraising with online petitions and activism on one platform


## Choose Funraise if

> Small and mid-size US nonprofits, especially those under about a million dollars in revenue, that want donation forms, recurring giving, peer-to-peer, events, and a donor CRM in one connected platform.

- All-in-one suite: donation forms, recurring giving, peer-to-peer, events, auctions, and donor CRM.
- Unusually broad donor payment options: cards, ACH, PayPal, Venmo, Apple Pay, DAFpay, stock, and crypto.
- Built by nonprofit veterans, with workflows tuned to sector needs.
- Optional donor cost-coverage so organizations keep more of each donation.