# BuonaCausa vs FundRazr

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, BuonaCausa delivers about 3.20 more of every 100 donated than FundRazr (€100.00 vs £96.80 per 100). BuonaCausa stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while FundRazr does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | BuonaCausa | FundRazr |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €100.00 | £96.80 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.00 | 2.9% + £0.30 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 3.3 (214) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 60 | 77 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 0 |
| Data residency | EU | Canada and US |
| Languages | 1 | 1 |
| Payment methods supported | 4 | 4 |

## Choose BuonaCausa if

> Italian associations, nonprofits, and individuals who want a no-commission way to collect donations directly into their own accounts, and campaigners who pair fundraising with online petitions and activism.

- Donations are paid directly into the organiser's own bank, PayPal, or postal account without platform intermediation
- No platform commission charged on donations
- Reduced third-party processing costs for recognised nonprofit (ONLUS) organisations
- Combines donation fundraising with online petitions and activism on one platform


## Choose FundRazr if

> North American nonprofits and individual fundraisers who want a flexible, long-established platform supporting donation campaigns, peer-to-peer events, and recurring giving with a tip-based pricing option.

- Long-established platform operating since 2010 with a large campaign track record
- Two pricing options: a donor-tip-funded plan or a platform-percentage plan
- Supports donations, peer-to-peer events, perks, and recurring giving
- Choice of keep-it-all or all-or-nothing campaign structures