# BuonaCausa vs Doare

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, BuonaCausa delivers about 6.25 more of every 100 donated than Doare (€100.00 vs £93.75 per 100). BuonaCausa stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Doare does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | BuonaCausa | Doare |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €100.00 | £93.75 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.00 | 5.8% + £0.45 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 60 | 72 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 1 |
| Data residency | EU | — |
| Languages | 1 | 3 |
| Payment methods supported | 4 | 8 |

## Choose BuonaCausa if

> Italian associations, nonprofits, and individuals who want a no-commission way to collect donations directly into their own accounts, and campaigners who pair fundraising with online petitions and activism.

- Donations are paid directly into the organiser's own bank, PayPal, or postal account without platform intermediation
- No platform commission charged on donations
- Reduced third-party processing costs for recognised nonprofit (ONLUS) organisations
- Combines donation fundraising with online petitions and activism on one platform


## Choose Doare if

> Brazilian nonprofits and third-sector organizations that want hosted donation pages, recurring-giving tools, and a donor CRM to build a sustained local donor base, rather than a one-off campaign.

- Purpose-built nonprofit toolkit: donation pages, recurring giving, and donor CRM.
- Supports Brazilian rails including boleto and PIX, plus automatic recurring PIX.
- Tiered plans with per-transaction costs that decrease at higher tiers.
- Peer-to-peer ambassador fundraising and corporate ESG and matching products.