# BetterWorld vs Migranodearena

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, BetterWorld delivers about 3.25 more of every 100 donated than Migranodearena (£96.80 vs €93.55 per 100). On the headline numbers, BetterWorld and Migranodearena are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | BetterWorld | Migranodearena |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £96.80 | €93.55 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 5% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.9% + £0.30 | 1.2% + €0.25 |
| Trustpilot | 2.9 (2) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 81 | 72 |
| Country coverage | 0 | 1 |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | 1 | 3 |
| Payment methods supported | 5 | 3 |

## Choose BetterWorld if

> Nonprofits, schools, PTOs, and community groups in the US running auctions, raffles, events, and peer-to-peer campaigns that want every fundraising tool available on every plan.

- Exceptionally broad format support: silent and live auctions, raffles, events, donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, paddle raise, and a-thons.
- No feature gating - every fundraising tool is available even on the free entry plan.
- Paid Partner ($1,550/year) and Keystone ($5,950/year) tiers lower the platform's percentage cut for higher-volume organizations.
- Most donors (over 95%) opt to cover payment processing, so organizations retain more of each gift.


## Choose Migranodearena if

> Spain-based nonprofits, companies, and individual fundraisers who want a high-reach solidarity crowdfunding marketplace with transparent, openly published fees, recurring-donation support, and Bizum, and who can accept monthly payouts.

- Large reach: more than 4,800 NGOs raise funds through the platform.
- Open to all creator types, including individuals, companies, collectives, and NGOs.
- Keep-it-all model: funds are released to the cause whether or not the goal is met.
- Transparent, openly published commission and payment-processing fees.