# BetterWorld vs GlobalGiving

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, BetterWorld delivers about £4.80 more of every £100 donated than GlobalGiving (£96.80 vs £92.00). On the headline numbers, BetterWorld and GlobalGiving are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | BetterWorld | GlobalGiving |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £96.80 | £92.00 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 5% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.9% + £0.30 | 3% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 2.9 (2) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 81 | 84 |
| Country coverage | 0 | 0 |
| Data residency | — | US |
| Languages | 1 | 1 |
| Payment methods supported | 5 | 11 |

## Choose BetterWorld if

> Nonprofits, schools, PTOs, and community groups in the US running auctions, raffles, events, and peer-to-peer campaigns that want every fundraising tool available on every plan.

- Exceptionally broad format support: silent and live auctions, raffles, events, donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, paddle raise, and a-thons.
- No feature gating - every fundraising tool is available even on the free entry plan.
- Paid Partner ($1,550/year) and Keystone ($5,950/year) tiers lower the platform's percentage cut for higher-volume organizations.
- Most donors (over 95%) opt to cover payment processing, so organizations retain more of each gift.


## Choose GlobalGiving if

> Donors and companies wanting to give to vetted grassroots nonprofits worldwide, and smaller international NGOs seeking a due-diligence stamp and access to US donors and corporate giving programs.

- Rigorous due-diligence vetting of every nonprofit, a strong trust signal for donors.
- Global reach connecting donors and companies with grassroots nonprofits worldwide.
- Established track record since 2002 with more than a million donors.
- Corporate-giving and disaster-relief programs beyond individual donations.