# BetterWorld vs Doneerveilig

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, BetterWorld delivers about 4.46 more of every 100 donated than Doneerveilig (£96.80 vs €92.34 per 100). On the headline numbers, BetterWorld and Doneerveilig are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | BetterWorld | Doneerveilig |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £96.80 | €92.34 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 6.7% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.9% + £0.30 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 2.9 (2) | 2.9 (44) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 81 | 21 |
| Country coverage | 0 | 0 |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | 1 | 1 |
| Payment methods supported | 5 | 2 |

## Choose BetterWorld if

> Nonprofits, schools, PTOs, and community groups in the US running auctions, raffles, events, and peer-to-peer campaigns that want every fundraising tool available on every plan.

- Exceptionally broad format support: silent and live auctions, raffles, events, donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, paddle raise, and a-thons.
- No feature gating - every fundraising tool is available even on the free entry plan.
- Paid Partner ($1,550/year) and Keystone ($5,950/year) tiers lower the platform's percentage cut for higher-volume organizations.
- Most donors (over 95%) opt to cover payment processing, so organizations retain more of each gift.


## Choose Doneerveilig if

> Dutch and Belgian individuals running personal fundraising campaigns who prioritise a security-focused, PSD2-compliant platform with escrow handling and a simple, quick setup.

- Security-focused framing: PSD2 compliance supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank, escrow handling, and SSL.
- Donations held on a third-party escrow account (derdengeldenrekening) before payout.
- Quick, simple campaign setup aimed at individual causes.
- Account verification via a one-cent micro-transfer.