# 4fund.com vs Petje Af

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, 4fund.com delivers about £6.00 more of every £100 donated than Petje Af (£100.00 vs £94.00). On the headline numbers, 4fund.com and Petje Af are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | 4fund.com | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £100.00 | £94.00 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 6% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + £0.00 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 3.9 (461) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 68 | 63 |
| Country coverage | 30 | 0 |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | 30 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 14 | 0 |

## Choose 4fund.com if

> Individuals, charities, and small organisations across the EEA who want a multilingual, no-commission fundraiser backed by an established Polish crowdfunding operator with EU payment-institution licensing.

- Operated by Zrzutka.pl, the company behind Poland's long-established zrzutka.pl crowdfunding platform, with over a decade of experience.
- Run by an operator that describes itself as an EU-licensed payment services provider supervised by Poland's financial regulator.
- Charges organisers no commission and takes no cut on deposits or withdrawals; sustained by an optional voluntary donor contribution.
- Broad European payment-rail support: iDEAL, Bancontact, MultiBanco, MB Way, and EPS, plus cards, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Revolut Pay, Skrill, N26, and ZEN.


## Choose Petje Af if

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.