# 4fund.com vs GINGER

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, 4fund.com delivers about 2.15 more of every 100 donated than GINGER (£100.00 vs €97.85 per 100). GINGER stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while 4fund.com does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | 4fund.com | GINGER |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £100.00 | €97.85 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + £0.00 | 1.8% + €0.35 |
| Trustpilot | 3.9 (461) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 68 | 65 |
| Country coverage | 30 | 1 |
| Data residency | — | EU |
| Languages | 30 | 1 |
| Payment methods supported | 14 | 4 |

## Choose 4fund.com if

> Individuals, charities, and small organisations across the EEA who want a multilingual, no-commission fundraiser backed by an established Polish crowdfunding operator with EU payment-institution licensing.

- Operated by Zrzutka.pl, the company behind Poland's long-established zrzutka.pl crowdfunding platform, with over a decade of experience.
- Run by an operator that describes itself as an EU-licensed payment services provider supervised by Poland's financial regulator.
- Charges organisers no commission and takes no cut on deposits or withdrawals; sustained by an optional voluntary donor contribution.
- Broad European payment-rail support: iDEAL, Bancontact, MultiBanco, MB Way, and EPS, plus cards, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Revolut Pay, Skrill, N26, and ZEN.


## Choose GINGER if

> Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

- One of the highest project-success rates among Italian crowdfunding platforms
- Mixed model supporting both reward-based campaigns and donation fundraising
- Open to individuals, associations, businesses, and public administrations
- Does not retain a platform percentage of funds raised (payment-processing commissions apply)